SpaceX Just Posted Its First Profit. Most of the Business Was Not Space.

SpaceX reported its third quarter on October 20, and the headline numbers were the kind that make a stock famous: revenue of $14.6 billion, up 161% from a year earlier, and net income of $4.4 billion, its first profitable quarter since the June IPO.¹ Read one line further down and a different company appears.

Of that $14.6 billion, $7.6 billion came from the Super Intelligence segment, the AI business, and $5.2 billion from Starlink connectivity. The Space segment, the rockets, brought in $1.8 billion and posted an operating loss of $7 million. Capital spending for the quarter was $19.6 billion, and $16.4 billion of it went to AI.¹

The quarter before looked the same. Second-quarter capital expenditure was $18.37 billion, of which $15.83 billion went to the AI segment, while the space unit took in $962 million and lost $542 million at the operating line.² By where it spends its money, the rocket company is a data center company with a launch division.

By where it spends its money, the rocket company is a data center company with a launch division.

The second space age is real. It is just bigger than one ticker.

None of this means the space story is over. It means the space story is not the same thing as the SpaceX story. On September 28, Starship reached orbit for the first time, about 26 minutes after lifting off from Starbase in Texas, and released all 26 of its Starlink V3 satellites. The ship lost an engine shortly after launch, and a planned ten-hour mission was cut to three hours and nine minutes before splashdown in the Pacific.³ SpaceX called it the first revenue-generating Starship flight.¹

The scale of the business underneath is hard to overstate. Starlink ended the quarter with 13.6 million consumer subscribers, up from 12 million in June, paying an average of $69 a month, across 174 countries, served by about 11,100 satellites in orbit. SpaceX flew 35 missions in the quarter and 113 so far this year.¹ Every one of those satellites, launches and terminals is built from parts, and SpaceX does not make all of them.

✓ Trusted partner One trader who followed SpaceX from its early days says the biggest opportunity of the second space age is a company that is not SpaceX, and he names it →

Washington is writing checks to more than one company

On Friday, October 23, NASA held what it called an Artemis Acceleration briefing at Kennedy Space Center. Artemis III remains on track for summer 2027, but it will not land on the Moon. It is a 14-day crewed rehearsal in low Earth orbit: a Blue Origin Blue Moon Mark 2 test lander launches on New Glenn, four astronauts launch on SLS and Orion, Orion docks with Blue Moon on day three, and docks with a SpaceX Starship test lander on day eight. NASA still plans to land astronauts near the lunar south pole on Artemis IV in 2028, and Administrator Jared Isaacman said the agency has not decided whether Starship or Blue Moon will carry that crew.⁴

That is two landers from two companies, and a deliberate choice to keep both. NASA’s timeline has SpaceX demonstrating ship-to-ship propellant transfer in early 2027⁴ and an uncrewed Starship landing on the Moon before the end of 2027, with Blue Origin’s uncrewed Mark 2 landing attempt in the first quarter of 2028.⁵

The military side is broader still. On May 28 the Space Force awarded Blue Origin a National Security Space Launch task order for a National Reconnaissance Office mission from Cape Canaveral, targeted for late 2027 or early 2028. SpaceX, United Launch Alliance and Blue Origin are now all eligible for that lane.⁶ And in April the Space Force handed 12 companies contracts worth up to $3.2 billion to build prototypes of space-based interceptors for the Golden Dome missile shield, with a demonstration due by 2028. The list ran from Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and RTX to Anduril, True Anomaly and Turion Space, with SpaceX one name among twelve. The Congressional Budget Office estimates a full interceptor network could cost as much as $542 billion over 20 years.⁷

“Golden Dome is real, and it is no longer theoretical,” Gen. Michael Guetlein, the program’s manager, told reporters at a Virginia base in remarks reported on April 30. The Pentagon’s own estimate for the program is about $185 billion, and it has directed $17 billion toward it for fiscal 2027.⁸

The suppliers and the rivals are reporting too

Rocket Lab, the most visible of the smaller launch companies, reported second-quarter revenue of $234.1 million on August 10, up 62% from a year earlier and a record, with backlog of $2.36 billion, up 137%, and more than 90 launches in its launch backlog. It guided to $250 million to $265 million for the third quarter and said Neutron production was aligned with delivering the rocket to the pad in the fourth quarter of this year. It also lost $49.3 million in the quarter.⁹

✓ Trusted partner See the research behind this story →

Blue Origin’s New Glenn, the rocket both NASA and the Space Force are now counting on, suffered an anomaly during a hot-fire test in late May⁶, and NASA’s schedule targets a return to flight in the fourth quarter of 2026, though a Reuters report suggests early 2027.⁵ That is the pattern across the industry: real contracts, real revenue, real setbacks, and a customer in Washington that wants more than one supplier for every job.

How big the pie gets

The World Economic Forum and McKinsey put the global space economy at $630 billion in 2023 and project it will reach about $1.8 trillion by 2035, growing almost twice as fast as global GDP. Most of that growth, they say, will not come from satellites and infrastructure but from businesses on Earth that use them, with six industries including defense, supply chain and digital communications expected to generate more than 60% of it.¹⁰

That is the second space age in one sentence. The first was a race between two governments. This one is a market: a prime contractor with its own AI ambitions, a second lander NASA refuses to drop, a national security customer spreading launches across three providers and interceptor work across twelve companies, a launch challenger with a $2.36 billion backlog, and a forecast that most of the money ends up with the companies that use space rather than the ones that reach it.

The risks are real and they are not small. SpaceX’s own stock went from a first-day close of $160.95 in June to $108 on August 5 and back to about $163 by October 12, and its largest insider unlock, up to 1.3 billion shares, was tied to the third-quarter report.¹¹ Guetlein told a House subcommittee on April 15, “If we cannot do it affordably, we will not go into production.”⁷ Rockets fail on test stands. Schedules slip. A company with a record backlog can still lose money for years.

But the question for an investor is no longer whether the space economy will grow. The contracts, the subscribers and the orbital flights have settled that. The question is where the growth lands. The biggest name in the industry has told you, in its own results, that its money is going somewhere else. The companies building what the second space age actually needs are not hard to find once you stop looking at only one.